You are currently browsing the DPhil-stuff weblog archives for the day 22/11/2008.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Oct | Dec » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
- adoption of technology (1)
- ASD (7)
- Aspergers/HFA (8)
- augmentalist (5)
- bibliography (5)
- biography (6)
- blog (8)
- boundaries (4)
- categories (2)
- change agents (6)
- community (16)
- community of practice (8)
- concepts (13)
- conferences (1)
- connectivism (1)
- coping (2)
- creativity (8)
- data analysis (1)
- decision making (1)
- editing (1)
- education (11)
- empowerment (10)
- ethics (4)
- experience (3)
- feminism (2)
- flow (12)
- funding (2)
- Government policy (10)
- hype cycle (3)
- imposter syndrome (2)
- informal learning (24)
- lace (5)
- learning (39)
- methodology (11)
- motivation (13)
- narratives (8)
- ownership (9)
- parenting (3)
- peer support (1)
- personal rant (3)
- planning (10)
- presenting (2)
- qualifications (1)
- qualitative research (1)
- questions (5)
- reflections (22)
- research ideas (13)
- resources (1)
- Second Life (19)
- self-directed learning (2)
- SEN (12)
- social learning (10)
- space/place (1)
- specialist knowledge (1)
- stories (2)
- struggle (6)
- stuckness (5)
- systems (4)
- tacit dimension (1)
- theory (1)
- thesis (2)
- threshold concepts (5)
- values (2)
- virtual environments (8)
- voice (3)
- writing (7)
- 26/11/2011: Slash and burn!
- 03/11/2011: To AcBoWriMo or not to AcBoWriMo...
- 23/10/2011: Progress - but not thanks to technology!
- 09/10/2011: Getting excited about my thesis
- 17/09/2011: Reflections on Med Soc 2011
- 01/09/2011: "Shut up and Write"
- 25/07/2011: Being an insider
- 28/06/2011: Do I own my DPhil, or has it a life of its own...
- 25/06/2011: The journey so far
- 29/04/2011: Conflict of interests
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
Archive for 22/11/2008
ReLIVE08
22/11/2008 by lizit.
I guess I should start a blog entry on the conference even though I haven’t really had time yet to assimilate much, if any of what I heard and experienced. Perhaps the biggest highlight of the whole conference was the high quality of so many of the presentations - thought provoking and lots of evidence for conclusions throughout - not a load of case studies and icing sugar. Although the most mentioned virtual world, perhaps inevitably, was Second Life, there were presentations based on other virtual worlds including World of Warcraft - is WoW a virtual world or a game or both? An excellent presentation by Sarah Robbins focused on the development of a taxonomy of virtual worlds - in my opinion much more thought through than the recent JISC review of serious virtual worlds - I must read the paper and look at the slides! Another presenter dealt with the necessary issue of what standards do we apply to our research in virtual worlds - and how do these compare with work in the ‘real world’; a number of research tools were considered alongside ethics and informed consent - remember there is a human behind every avatar (very few non-player characters in Second Life at present).
I have a lot of reading to do if I am to assimilate the content of the presentations I saw and also get a flavour of the many I was not able to see.
An interesting observation on my presentation from Mike Hobbs - he hadn’t considered using students to facilitate change in his institution before. Even though I had left change from the table on my presentation and had said we did not consider ourselves change agents, Mike has a point. We were engaged in a change process and maybe I am failing to notice the obvious - the effect of being involved in this type of project on the attitudes and practices of the staff involved. Moves into the world of psychology. I need to think more about this!
Looking at the blogs and twitter feeds, it is clear people enjoyed the conference - and frighteningly are talking about ReLIVE09! It even seems as though some might be considering offering some funding! For the moment, I need a good rest and an opportunity to recuperate before thinking of going near organising any more conferences!
Posted in change agents, Second Life, virtual environments | Print | No Comments »